Using robot-assisted surgery in gynecological diseases in children: a series of clinical cases

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the recent years, robot-assisted surgery has become widespread and has demonstrated the ability to overcome technical limitations of traditional laparoscopy and open surgery. Advantages of robotic surgery are: three-dimensional imaging and multiple magnification, increased maneuverability due to seven degrees of freedom of robotic instruments, tremor filtering, and improved ergonomics.

AIM: evaluate the safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted surgeries performed in pediatric patients with gynecological pathology.

METHODS: The present trial is a retrospective analysis of data from patients with gynecological diseases operated on in the Irkutsk State Regional Children’s Clinical Hospital. Versius robotic system (Cambridge Medical Robotics, Great Britain) was used.

RESULTS: Robot-assisted surgeries were performed in 5 patients who had the following diagnoses before surgery: ovarian teratoma (in 3 patients), ovarian cyst (in 2 patients, of which one had a concomitant formation in the form of a paratubic cyst). The size of the tumors, measured before surgery using ultrasound and computed tomography, was 1.8±2.4 cm (median 0.4 cm [0.4; 2.5]). Cystic formations were located mainly on the left (3:2). The average age of patients at the time of surgery was 12.2±2.0 years (median 11.0 years [10.0; 13.0]), the average body weight was 49.8±10.1 kg (median 52.0 [41.0; 56.0]). The lowest body weight of an operated child was 38 kg. Robot-assisted procedures included ovarian cystectomy (in 2 patients), teratoma enucleation (in 3 patients), and excision of a paratubal cyst (in 1 patient). The average surgery duration was 74.0±22.2 minutes (median 75.0 [70.0; 85.0]). During surgery, there were no complications like bleeding from the ovarian tissue or damage to neighboring organs. Cystic contents in all cases was clear liquid without pathological impurities. Histological findings established the following final diagnoses: “Serous ovarian cystadenoma” (in 2 patients), “Mature cystic teratoma” (in 1), “Mature cystic-solid teratoma” (in 2), “Paratubal cyst” (in 1). The length of stay of patients in the intensive care unit was 3.2±0.4 hours (median 3.0 [3.0; 3.0]), hospitalization lasted for 4.0±1.5 days (4.0 [3.0; 4.0]). Ultrasound examination in 1, 3 and 6 months after the surgery revealed no signs of recurrence of the disease.

CONCLUSION: Our trial has reached the main goal―to provide 3D visual control of the targeted anatomic area of surgical intervention and safe removal of pathological formations with preservation of the ovarian tissue. Thus, robot-assisted manipulations in girls with gynecological pathologies are possible.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Y. A. Kozlov

Irkutsk State Regional Children’s Clinical Hospital; Irkutsk State Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education―branch Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education; Irkutsk State Medical University

Email: yuriherz@hotmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2313-897X
SPIN-code: 3682-0832

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Russian Federation, Irkutsk; Irkutsk; Irkutsk

Alexander P. Rozhansky

Irkutsk State Regional Children’s Clinical Hospital; Irkutsk State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: alexanderozhanski@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7922-7600
SPIN-code: 4012-7120
Russian Federation, Irkutsk; Irkutsk

E. V. Sapukhin

Irkutsk State Regional Children’s Clinical Hospital

Email: sapukhin@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5470-7384
Russian Federation, Irkutsk

A. S. Strashinsky

Irkutsk State Regional Children’s Clinical Hospital

Email: leksus-642@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1911-4468

MD

Russian Federation, Irkutsk

A. A. Marchuk

Irkutsk State Regional Children’s Clinical Hospital

Email: maa-ped20@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9767-0454

MD

Russian Federation, Irkutsk

A. O. Ryakhina

Irkutsk State Regional Children’s Clinical Hospital

Email: romahka@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0006-0340-1186
Russian Federation, Irkutsk

M. V. Makarochkina

Irkutsk State Regional Children’s Clinical Hospital

Email: m.makarochkina@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8295-6687
SPIN-code: 4600-4071
Russian Federation, Irkutsk

References

  1. Denning NL, Kallis MP, Prince JM. Pediatric robotic surgery. Surg Clin North Am. 2020;100(2):431–443. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2019.12.004 EDN: GAWIAT
  2. Lane T. A short history of robotic surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018;100(6 Supp):5–7. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.supp1.5
  3. Steyaert H, Van Der Veken E, Joyeux L. Implementation of robotic surgery in a pediatric hospital: lessons learned. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019;29(2):136–140. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0426
  4. Spinoit AF, Nguyen H, Subramaniam R. Role of robotics in children: a brave New World! Eur Urol Focus. 2017;3(2-3):172–180. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.08.011 EDN: SZELMT
  5. Hares L, Roberts P, Marshall K, Slack M. Using end-user feedback to optimize the design of the versius surgical system, a new robot-assisted device for use in minimal access surgery. BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2019;1(1):e000019. doi: 10.1136/bmjsit-2019-000019
  6. El Dahdah J, Halabi M, Kamal J, et al. Initial experience with a novel robotic surgical system in abdominal surgery. J Robot Surg. 2023;17(3):841–846. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01471-0 EDN: MLCQOX
  7. Varda BK, Wang Y, Chung BI, et al. Has the robot caught up? National trends in utilization, perioperative outcomes, and cost for open, laparoscopic, and robotic pediatric pyeloplasty in the United States from 2003 to 2015. J Pediatr Urol. 2018;14(4):336.e1–336.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.12.010
  8. Mei H, Tang S. Robotic-assisted surgery in the pediatric surgeons’ world: current situation and future prospectives. Front Pediatr. 2023;11:1120831. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1120831 EDN: RBCKSR
  9. Nakib G, Calcaterra V, Scorletti F, et al. Robotic assisted surgery in pediatric gynecology: promising innovation in mini invasive surgical procedures. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2013;26(1):e5–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2012.09.009
  10. Xie XX, Wang N, Wang ZH, et al. Robotic-assisted resection of ovarian tumors in children: a case report and review of literature. World J Clin Cases. 2019;7(17):2542–2548. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i17.2542
  11. Xu D, Gao H, Yu S, et al. Ensuring safety and feasibility for resection of pediatric benign ovarian tumors by single-port robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery using the Da Vinci XI system. Front Surg. 2022;9:944662. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.944662 EDN: TYFGJX
  12. Esposito C, Blanc T, Di Mento C, et al. Robotic-assisted surgery for gynecological indications in children and adolescents: European multicenter report. J Robot Surg. 2024;18(1):20. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01767-9 EDN: RBUCHV

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvic organs of a patient with teratoma of the left ovary.

Download (601KB)
3. Fig. 2. Robot-assisted cystectomy: the stage of dissection of the outer shell of the ovary.

Download (687KB)
4. Fig. 3. Robot-assisted cystectomy: the stage of shell enucleation.

Download (712KB)

Copyright (c) 2026 Rozhansky A.P., Kozlov Y.A., Marchuk A.A., Sapukhin E.V., Strashinsky A.S., Makarochkina M.V., Ryakhina A.O.

License URL: https://eco-vector.com/for_authors.php#07