Robot-assisted heminefrectomy in a patient with duplex kidney: а case report
- Authors: Kozlov Y.A.1,2,3, Rozhanski A.P.1,3, Sapukhin E.V.1, Strashinsky A.S.1, Makarochkina M.V.1, Marchuk A.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Irkutsk State Regional Children's Clinical Hospital
- Irkutsk State Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education
- Irkutsk State Medical University
- Issue: Vol 30, No 1 (2026)
- Pages: 65-72
- Section: Case reports
- Submitted: 07.10.2025
- Accepted: 16.02.2026
- Published: 11.03.2026
- URL: https://jps-nmp.ru/jour/article/view/895
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/ps895
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OQTPAJ
- ID: 895
Cite item
Abstract
Robot-assisted surgery is a relatively new technology that enables a wide range of urological procedures to be performed using a minimally invasive approach. Various studies have shown that this technology is feasible and safe in most pediatric patients.
The authors of this study conducted a retrospective review of the medical history of a child with a doubling of the upper urinary tract, accompanied by obstructive damage to the upper segment of the ureter with loss of its excretory function. The data collection included the patient's medical history and demographic data, diagnosis, type of surgery, total time of surgery, outcome of surgery, and the anatomical and functional state of the kidney during follow-up.
A 12-year-old girl presented to the surgical department with complaints of recurrent urinary tract infections and right flank pain for the last year of her life. Robot-assisted laparoscopic heminephrectomy (RALHN) was performed using the Versius surgical robot. The upper segment ureter was transected at the lower pole of the kidney. The afunctional portion of the kidney was dissected from the normal kidney using a bipolar coagulation clamp. The lower segment incision edges were left open. The distal ureter was then isolated and sealed with a clip. The robot-assisted laparoscopic heminephrectomy procedure was successfully performed without intraoperative complications. The surgery duration was 225 minutes, including 20 minutes for robotic insertion. The total console time was 205 minutes. The drainage tube was removed after a follow-up ultrasound examination on the second day. The stent remained in the lower segment ureter until its removal six weeks after surgery. A repeat ultrasound examination performed postoperatively demonstrated no dilation of the lower segment pelvis or fluid collections in the area of the right kidney. Blood flow to the residual segment of the right kidney was not impaired.
The advantages of the robotic approach to treating upper urinary tract duplication, including improved instrument maneuverability and 3D visualization, make it a safe and effective alternative to open or laparoscopic surgery in children.
Full Text
About the authors
Yury A. Kozlov
Irkutsk State Regional Children's Clinical Hospital; Irkutsk State Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education; Irkutsk State Medical University
Email: yuriherz@hotmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2313-897X
SPIN-code: 3682-0832
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation, Irkutsk; Irkutsk; IrkutskAlexander P. Rozhanski
Irkutsk State Regional Children's Clinical Hospital; Irkutsk State Medical University
Author for correspondence.
Email: alexanderozhanski@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7922-7600
SPIN-code: 4012-7120
Russian Federation, Irkutsk; Irkutsk
Eduard V. Sapukhin
Irkutsk State Regional Children's Clinical Hospital
Email: sapukhin@уandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5470-7384
Russian Federation, Irkutsk
Alexey S. Strashinsky
Irkutsk State Regional Children's Clinical Hospital
Email: leksus-642@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1911-4468
Russian Federation, Irkutsk
Marina V. Makarochkina
Irkutsk State Regional Children's Clinical Hospital
Email: makarochkina@igodkb.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8295-6687
SPIN-code: 4600-4071
Russian Federation, Irkutsk
Andrey A. Marchuk
Irkutsk State Regional Children's Clinical Hospital
Email: maa-ped20@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9767-0454
MD
Russian Federation, IrkutskReferences
- Denning NL, Kallis MP, Prince JM. Pediatric robotic surgery. Surg Clin North Am. 2020;100(2):431–443. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2019.12.004 EDN: GAWIAT
- Mei H, Tang S. Robotic-assisted surgery in the pediatric surgeons’ world: current situation and future prospectives. Front Pediatr. 2023;11:1120831. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1120831 EDN: RBCKSR
- Cundy TP, Harley SJ, Marcus HJ, et al. Global trends in paediatric robot-assisted urological surgery: a bibliometric and progressive scholarly acceptance analysis. J Robot Surg. 2018;12(1):109–115. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0703-3
- Olsen LH, Jørgensen TM. Robotically assisted retroperitoneoscopic heminephrectomy in children: initial clinical results. J Pediatr Urol. 2005;1(2):101–104. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2005.01.003
- Lee RS, Sethi AS, Passerotti CC, et al. Robot assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a viable and safe option in children. J Urol. 2009;181:823–828; discussion 828-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.073
- Mason MD, Anthony Herndon CD, Smith-Harrison LI, et al. Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy in duplicated collecting systems in the pediatric population: techniques and outcomes. J Pediatr Urol. 2014;10(2):374–379. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2013.10.014
- Malik RD, Pariser JJ, Gundeti MS. Outcomes in pediatric robot-assisted laparoscopic heminephrectomy compared with contemporary open and laparoscopic series. J Endourol. 2015;29(12):1346–1352. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0818
- Herz D, Smith J, McLeod D, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic management of duplex renal anomaly: comparison of surgical outcomes to traditional pure laparoscopic and open surgery. J Pediatr Urol. 2016;12:44e1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.04.046
- Ballouhey Q, Binet A, Clermidi P, et al. Partial nephrectomy for small children: robot-assisted versus open surgery. Int J Urol. 2017;24(12):855–860. doi: 10.1111/iju.13466
- Privett JT, Jeans WD, Roylance J. The incidence and importance of renal duplication. Clin Radiol. 1976;27(4):521–530. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(76)80121-3
- Mizuno K, Kojima Y, Nishio H, et al. Robotic surgery in pediatric urology: current status. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2018;11(4):308–317. doi: 10.1111/ases.12653
- Hares L, Roberts P, Marshall K, Slack M. Using end-user feedback to optimize the design of the versius surgical system, a new robot-assisted device for use in minimal access surgery. BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2019;1(1):e000019. doi: 10.1136/bmjsit-2019-000019
- Polok M, Dzielendziak A, Apoznanski W, Patkowski D. Laparoscopic heminephrectomy for duplex kidney in children-the learning curve. Front Pediatr. 2019;7:117. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00117
- Kagantsov IM, Sizonov VV, Dubrov VI, et al. Uretero-ureteral anastomosis (ureteropyeloanasto-mosis) for the duplicated upper urinary tract in children. Urology. 2018;(2):83–88. doi: 10.18565/urology.2018.2.83-88 EDN: XOTLYT
- Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J Urol. 1991;146(2):278–282. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37770-4
- Das S, Keizur JJ, Tashima M. Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for end-stage reflux nephropathy in a child. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1993;3(6):462–465.
- Jordan GH, Winslow BH. Laparoendoscopic upper pole partial nephrectomy with ureterectomy. J Urol. 1993;150(3):940–943. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35656-2
- Malashenko AS, Poddubny IV, Faizulin AK, et al. Laparoscopic and open heminephrectomy in children: results comparison. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2014;(10):68–72. EDN: TAQYFF
- Shen LT, Tou J. Application and prospects of robotic surgery in children: a scoping review. World J Pediatr Surg. 2022;5(4):e000482. doi: 10.1136/wjps-2022-000482 EDN: LSWTQW
- Brownlee EM, Slack M. The role of the versius surgical robotic system in the paediatric population. Children (Basel). 2022;9(6):805. doi: 10.3390/children9060805 EDN: EEQGDV
- You D, Bang JK, Shim M, et al. Analysis of the late outcome of laparoscopic heminephrectomy in children with duplex kidneys. BJU Int. 2010;106(2):250–254. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.09038.x
Supplementary files





