Laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation in the recurrent vesicoureteral reflux in a 12-year-old child



Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Introduction. The antireflux reimplantation of the ureter may be performed using different surgical approaches with the known techniques. Despite the high efficiency of these surgical interventions, there are cases of reflux relapses even after several surgical interventions on the ureterovesical junction (UVJ). The range of ways for laparoscopic reconstruction of the upper urinary tract is increasingly expanding what allows toperform a successful correction of the defect even in technically difficult positions. The main purpose of the present clinical demonstration is to illustrate a successful application of laparoscopic access in the correction of recurrent forms of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR).

Material and methods. The authors present a clinical case and management of a patient with Grade 4 VUR on the right (classification by P.E. Heikel et K.V. Parkkulainen, 1966). Previously, a 12-year-old boy had four surgical interventions, both open traditional correction and endovesical implantations of volume-forming drugs. The reflux persisted and was accompanied with constant recurrences of pyelonephritis and progressive deterioration of the kidney function on the right.

Results. Despite technical difficulties associated with cicatricial changes in UVJ, an antireflux surgery with laparoscopic access was performed. The follow-up control within one year revealed no recurrences of urinary tract infection. Findings of VUR control examination demonstrated that the renal function was stabilized.

Conclusions. A rational approach and justified surgical access have given good outcomes in this patient.

About the authors

A. S. Vrublevskiy

St. Luka’s Clinical Research Center for Children

Author for correspondence.
Email: a.s.vrublevskiy@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7312-5945

Artem S. Vrublevskiy – MD, Candidate of Medical Sciences, pediatric urologist at the surgical department

119620, Moscow, Russian Federation

Russian Federation

S. G. Vrublevskiy

St. Luka’s Clinical Research Center for Children; Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8550-8636

119620, Moscow, Russian Federation

117997, Moscow, Russian Federation

Russian Federation

Y. A. Galkina

St. Luka’s Clinical Research Center for Children

119620, Moscow, Russian Federation

Russian Federation

A. A. Oganisyan

St. Luka’s Clinical Research Center for Children

ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5495-4315

119620, Moscow, Russian Federation

Russian Federation

R. Yu. Valiev

St. Luka’s Clinical Research Center for Children

119620, Moscow, Russian Federation

Russian Federation

I. S. Ahmetzhanov

St. Luka’s Clinical Research Center for Children

ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2517-7446

119620, Moscow, Russian Federation

Russian Federation

E. N. Vrublevskaya

St. Luka’s Clinical Research Center for Children; Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

119620, Moscow, Russian Federation

117997, Moscow, Russian Federation

Russian Federation

References

  1. Айнакулов А.Д., Зоркин С.Н. Диагностика и лечение обструктивных уропатий у детей. Детская хирургия. 2012; (6): 23-6.
  2. Peters CA, Skoog SJ, Arant BS Jr, et al: Summary of the AUA Guideline on Management of Primary Vesicoureteral Reflux in Children. J. Urol. 2010; 184(3): 1134–44.
  3. Айнакулов А.Д. Трансуретральное эндоскопическое лечение врождённого обструктивного мегауретера у детей. Эндоскопическая хирургия. 2011; 17(3): 44-6.
  4. Wacksman J. Initial results with the Cohen cross-trigonalureteroneocystotomy. J Urol. 1983.; 129: 1198-9.
  5. Врублевский А.С., Поддубный И.В. Эндовидеохирургические вмешательства при патологии пузырно-мочеточникового соустья у детей. Детская хирургия. 2017; 21(1): 38-41.
  6. Дубров В.И., Бондаренко С.Г., Каганцов И.М. Модифицированная односторонняя лапароскопическая экстравезикальная антирефлюксная операция: сравнение с традиционной методикой. Российский вестник детской хирургии, анестезиологии и реаниматологии. 2018; 8(2): 26-34.
  7. Шмыров О.С., Врублевский С.Г. Эндохирургические вмешательства в коррекции патологии уретеровезикального сегмента у детей. Детская хирургия. 2014; 18(4): 25-8.
  8. Lavine M.A., Siddiq F.M., Cahn D.J., Caesar R.E., Koyle M.A., Calda-mone A.A. Vesicoureteral reflux after ureteroneocystostomy:in dications for postoperative voiding cystography. Tech. Urol.2001; 7: 50-4.
  9. Charbonneau S.G., Tackett L.D., Gray E.H., Caesar R.E., Caldamone A.A. Is long-term sonographic followup necessary afteruncomplicated ureteral reimplantation in children? J. Urol. 2005;174: 1429-31.
  10. Peters CA, Skoog SJ, Arant BS Jr, et al: Summary of the AUA Guideline on Management of Primary Vesicoureteral Reflux in Children. J. Urol. 2010; 184(3): 1134-44.
  11. Bar-Yosef Y., Castellan M., Joshi D., Labbie A., Gosalbez R. Sal-vage dextranomer-hyaluronic acid copolymer for persistentreflux after ureteral reimplantation: early success rates. J. Urol. 2011; 185 Suppl. 6: 2531-4.
  12. Hubert K.C., Kokorowski P.J., Huang L., Prasad M.M., Rosoklija I., Retik A.B., et al. Clinical outcomes and long-term resolution in patients ьwith persistent vesicoureteral reflux after open ureteral reim-plantation. J. Urol. 2012; 188 Suppl. 4: 1474-9.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c)