Basic reasons for the inefficiency of conservative treatment of ileocecal intussusception in children

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Introduction. Currently, the conservative treatment of ileocecal intussusception (ICI) has proven its effectiveness; indications for surgical treatment are increasingly narrowing and do not depend on disease duration and child’s age. And yet, there are situations when conservative treatment is ineffective, and surgical intervention is a must.

Purpose. To analyze reasons leading to ineffective conservative treatment of ileocecal intussusception in children and, accordingly, to specify current indications for surgical treatment.

Material and methods. 160 children with ICI, who were treated in the Clinical and Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Trauma (CRIEPST) in Moscow from 2011 to 2021, were taken in the trail. Boys prevailed and amounted to 67.5% (108), girls – to 32.5% (52). Average age of patients was 2.9±2.02. 81.2% (130 children ) were older than one year. If the disease was diagnosed for the first time and if there were no complications, patients with ICI had hydrocolonoscopy (HCS), regardless of child’s age and disease duration. If HCS was ineffective, laparoscopy was done. Laparoscopy was also made in case of disease recurrence. If laparoscopic disinvagination was ineffective or impossible, laparotomy was performed. In case of effective laparoscopic disinvagination but in disease relapse and in the absence of intra-abdominal anatomical problems in the postoperative period, colonoscopy was made to rule out intraluminal anatomical pathologies. In the present trial, the researchers assessed causes of ineffective HCS: anatomical problems including volumetric lymphadenopathy, invaginate necrosis and disease relapses. Types of surgical intervention and their effectiveness were also analyzed. Additionally, the authors compared studied parameters obtained in the hospital earlier when HCS protocol (n=160; 2011–2021) and laparoscopic disinvagination protocol were used (n =40, 2007–2010).

Results. Surgical intervention by HCS protocol was made in 9.4% (15); HCS effectiveness was as high as 90.6%. Laparoscopy was performed in 6 children (3.75%) after ineffective HCS and in 9 children (5.6%) after disease relapse. Laparoscopic disinvagination was effective in 60.0% of cases (9) from the surgical group; laparoscopy was changed for laparotomy in 6 patients (40%). Anatomical problems accounted for 73.3% (11) in the surgical group and for 6.9% in the study group, respectively. In the rest of patients (4–26.7%), ineffectiveness of conservative disinvagination was caused by severe lymphoid hyperplasia of the ileocecal angle. In early disease relapses, 42.9% of such patients had anatomical problems. In the surgical group, invaginate necrosis was registered in 20% (3), and bowel resection with anastomosis was made in 26.7% (4); in the study group, these indexes were 1.9 and 2.5%, respectively.

Conclusion. The basic reason for ICI conservative treatment failure was an anatomical problem which is a leadpoint of disease pathogenesis that causes both intussusception necrosis and intussusception relapses. Currently, the main indications for surgical ICI management are ineffectiveness of conservative treatment and ICI relapses regardless of child’s age and disease duration.

About the authors

O. V. Karaseva

Clinical and Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Trauma; National Medical Research Center for Children’s Health

Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9418-4418

119180, Moscow

119296, Moscow

Russian Federation

D. E. Golikov

Clinical and Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Trauma

Author for correspondence.
Email: den-izym@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5982-5494

Denis Е. Golikov, pediatric surgeon, department of combined trauma

119180, Moscow

Russian Federation

A. L.  Gorelik

Clinical and Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Trauma

Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1746-8446

119180, Moscow

Russian Federation

A. Yu. Kharitonova

Clinical and Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Trauma

Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6218-3605

119180, Moscow

Russian Federation

A. V. Timofeeva

Clinical and Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Trauma

Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6940-4535

119180, Moscow

Russian Federation

A.  N. Kislyakov

Clinical and Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Trauma; Morozovskaya Children’s Clinical Hospital

Email: fake@neicon.ru

119180, Moscow

119049 Moscow

Russian Federation

V. I. Lukyanov

Clinical and Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Trauma

Email: fake@neicon.ru

119180, Moscow

Russian Federation

References

  1. Hutchinson J. A successful case of abdominal section for intussusception. Proc R Med Chir Soc. 1873; 7: 195–18.
  2. Ravitch M.M., McCune R.M. Reduction of intussusception by barium enema: a clinical and experimental study. Ann Surg. 1948; 128: 904–17.
  3. Hunter J. On introsusception. Trans Soc Improv Med Surg Knowledge.1793; 1: 103–18.
  4. McDermott V.G. Childhood intussusception and approaches to treatment: a historical review. Pediatr. Radiol. 1994; 24: 153–15.
  5. Hirschprung H. 107 Falle von darminvagination bei Kinder, Behandelt in Konigin Louisen – Kinderhospital in Kopengagen wahrend der Jahre 1871-1904 Mitt. Grenzgeb. Med und Chir. 1905; 14: 555–6.
  6. Hipsley P.L. Intussusception and its treatment by hydrostatic pressure: based on an analysis of one hundred consecutive cases so treated. Med J Aust. 1926; 2: 201–6.
  7. Бондаренко Н.С. Инвагинация кишечника у детей: методы диагностики и лечения: Автореф. дисс. ... канд. мед. наук. СПб.; 2017.
  8. Баиров Г.А. Срочная хирургия детей: руководство для врачей. СПб.: Питер пресс, 1997: 165–88.
  9. Портной В.М. Лечение кишечной инвагинации нагнетанием воздуха. Вестник хирургии. 1962; 11: 93–100.
  10. Рошаль Л.M. Острая инвагинация кишок у детей: Автореф. дисс. … канд. мед. наук. Москва. 1964.
  11. Дронов А.Ф., Поддубный И.В., Смирнов А.Н., Аль-Машат Н.А. Лапароскопия в лечении инвагинации кишки у детей грудного возраста. Хирургия. 2003; 11: 28–32.
  12. Соколов Ю.Ю., Коровин С.А., Туманян Г.Т. и др. Эффективность лапароскопических вмешательств у детей с кишечной инвагинацией. Медицинский вестник Северного Кавказа. 2017; 12(2): 131–14.
  13. Apelt N., Featherstone N., Giuliani S. laparoscopic treatment of intussusception in children: A systematic review. J of Ped Surg. 2013; 48: 1789–93.
  14. Карасева О.В., Журавлев Н.А., Капустин В.А., Брянцев А.В., Граников О.Д. Первый опыт гидростатической дезинвагинации у детей. Российский вестник детской хирургии, анестезиологии и реаниматологии. 2014; 4: 115–20.
  15. Румянцева Г.Н., Юсуфов А.А., Казаков А.Н., Бревдо Ю.Ф., Трухачев С.В., Светлов В.В. Неоперативное расправление инвагинации кишечника у детей методом гидроэхоколоноскопии. Журнал им. Н.В. Склифосовского «Неотложная медицинская помощь». 2015; 4: 55–8.
  16. Flaum V., Schneider A., Ferreira C., et al. Twenty years’ experience for reduction of ileocolic intussusceptions by saline enema under sonography control. J Pediatric Surg. 2016; 51: 179–82.
  17. Яницкая М.Ю., Михайленко Б.Ю., Островский В.Г., Сапожников В.Г., Карякин А.А. Сравнительная характеристика безопасности гидростатической и пневматической дезинвагинации в теории, эксперименте и практике. Вестник новых медицинских технологий, электронный журнал. 2017; 2: 231–9. https://doi.org/10.12737/article_58f0b8942f4466.90324668
  18. Wang G.D., Lin S.I. Enema reduction of intussusception by hydrostatic pressure under ultrasound guidance: A report of 377 cases. I. Pediatric Surgery. 1988; 23: 814–8.
  19. Ольхова Е.Б., Соколов Ю.Ю., Аллахвердиев И.С., Туманян Г.Т. Кишечная инвагинация у детей. Возможности ультразвуковой диагностики. Детская хирургия. 2015; 19(1): 20–4.
  20. Подкаменев В.В., Шарапов И.С., Пикало И.А., Петров Е.М., Потемкин М.И., Латыпов В.Х., Михайлов Н.И., Мороз С.В. Клинические и современные особенности инвагинации кишок у детей. Детская хирургия. 2018; 22(1): 13–6. https://doi.org/10.18821/1560-9510-2018-22-1-13-16
  21. Беляев М.К. Оптимизация лечебного алгоритма при инвагинации кишечника у детей. Детская хирургия. 2012; 6: 8–11.
  22. Карасева О.В., Голиков Д.Е., Харитонова А.Ю., Горелик А.Л., Тимофеева А.В., Батунина И.В., Янюшкина О.Г., Кисляков А.Н. Перемежающаяся инвагинация кишок на фоне лимфаденопатии илеоцекального угла. Детская хирургия. 2021; 25(3): 192–8. https://doi.org/10.18821/1560-9510-2021-25-3-192-197

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c)

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies