Subjective pediatric assessment scar scale - SPASS. Development and validation of the scale.
- Authors: Savelev D.S1, Gorodkov S.Y.2, Goremykin I.V1, Bratashova M.V3
-
Affiliations:
- Saratov State Medical University named after V. I. Razumovsky
- Saratov State Medical University named after V. I. Razumovsky
- Saratov State University named after N.G. Chernyshevsky
- Section: ORIGINAL STUDY
- Submitted: 29.09.2024
- Accepted: 24.03.2025
- Published: 24.04.2025
- URL: https://jps-nmp.ru/jour/article/view/822
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/ps822
- ID: 822
Cite item
Abstract
Background. Scarring is an inevitable outcome of traumatization of the skin after surgery. A skin scar is an important component of satisfaction with surgical treatment at any age. The clinical outcome of scarring on the skin can take various forms from barely noticeable whitish lines to the formation of pathological, keloid formations. Both the patient's comfort level and the possible treatment tactics depend on this. That is why the scar should be subject to systematization and evaluation at different stages of its formation, both from a quantitative standpoint and taking into account subjective perception.
Aim. Creation of a new tool for assessing a skin scar in a child. It should take into account the requirements of clinometry, the age and psychological characteristics of the child, be easy to understand and complete, as well as quick to interpret the results.
Methods. A total of 170 children participated in the study at various stages of the development and validation of the questionnaire scale. The inclusion criteria were: the presence of a skin scar acquired as a result of surgery, the period from the moment of surgery is more than a year, age 7-17 years, consent to participate in the study. The study period is from 2021 to 2024. The procedures of exploratory factor analysis and multiple regression analysis were carried out, taking into account all the standard criteria necessary for this. Spearman's criterion was chosen as a statistical criterion for comparing sets with each other.
Results. SPASS consists of three sheets with questions. Each of them is intended for personal filling by the child, his parent and, finally, the doctor. The questionnaire sheets for children are divided depending on the age periodization. The average level of inter–expert reliability among doctors was 0,96 (0,93 - 0,99; 95% CI). Intra–expert reliability had a variation from 0,85 (0,88 – 0,82; 95% CI) to 0,97 (0,95 - 0,99; 95% CI). The cumulative convergent validity value for the questionnaire was 0.95. The total Cronbach's α level for the data obtained among parents was 0,83.The overall subjective assessment of a skin scar significantly correlates positively with the following indicators: social aspects of the presence of a scar (R0 = 0,899, p < 0.001), physical inconveniences (R0 = 0,835, p < 0.001), problems of aesthetics and treatment (R0 = 0,733, p < 0.001).
Conclusion. Subjective pediatric assessment scar scale (SPASS) is the first tool of its kind to be used among children. The questionnaire is adapted for children of different ages, taking into account the periodization of mental development. The inclusion of the opinion of a doctor and a parent in the scale is innovative and allows us to most fully determine the subjective attitude to a skin scar in a child.
Full Text

About the authors
Dmitri S Savelev
Saratov State Medical Universitynamed after V. I. Razumovsky
Author for correspondence.
Email: saveljevds@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0006-6832-3318
ассистент кафедры хирургии детского возраста им. НВ Захарова
Россия, Bolshaya Kazachia st., 112 Saratov, 410012 RussiaSergei Yu Gorodkov
Saratov State Medical University named after V. I. Razumovsky
Email: gorodcov@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9281-6872
доцент, кафедра хирургии детского возраста им НВ Захарова.
Россия, Bolshaya Kazachia st., 112 Saratov, 410012 RussiaIgor V Goremykin
Saratov State Medical Universitynamed after V. I. Razumovsky
Email: goremykine@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6074-9780
профессор, заведующий кафедрой хирургии детского возраста им НВ Захарова
Россия, Bolshaya Kazachia st., 112 Saratov, 410012 RussiaMaria V Bratashova
Saratov State University named after N.G. Chernyshevsky
Email: bratashovamv@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4253-0259
Россия, 410012 Russia, Astrakhanskaya st., 83 Saratov.
References
- Ferguson MW, Whitby DJ, Shah M, et al. Scar formation: the spectral nature of fetal and adult wound repair. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996;97:854 - 60.
- Andrade WN, Semple JL. Patient self-assessment of the cosmetic results of breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;117:44 - 7
- Palmieri TL, Petuskey K, Bagley A, et al. Alterations in functional movement after axillary burn scar contracture: a motion analysis study. J Burn Care Rehabil 2003;24:104 - 8
- Robson MC, Barnett RA, Leitch IO, et al. Prevention and treatment of postburn scars and contracture. World J Surg 1992;16: 87 - 96
- Vercelli S, Ferriero G, Sartorio F, Cisari C, Bravini E. Clinimetric properties and clinical utility in rehabilitation of postsurgical scar rating scales: a systematic review. Int J Rehabil Res. 2015;38(4):279-286
- Vercelli S, Ferriero G, Sartorio F, Stissi V, Franchignoni F. How to assess postsurgical scars: a review of outcome measures. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(25):2055-2063.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
- Durani P, McGrouther DA, Ferguson MW. Current scales for assessing human scarring: a review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62(6):713-720.
- Nguyen TA, Feldstein SI, Shumaker PR, Krakowski AC. A review of scar assessment scales. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2015;34(1):28-36.
- Maher IA, Fosko S, Alam M. Experience vs experiments with the purse-string closure: unexpected results. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151(3):259-260.
- Varni JW, Seid M, Kurtin PS. PedsQL 4.0: reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations. Med Care. 2001 Aug;39(8):800-12. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200108000-00006.
- Draaijers LJ, Tempelman FR, Botman YA, et al. Colour evaluationin scars: tristimulus colorimeter, narrow-band simple reflectance meter or subjective evaluation. Burns 2004; 30:103 - 7
- Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res 2002;11: 193-205
- Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003
- Robinson A, Kardos M, Kimball AB. Physician Global Assessment (PGA) and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI): why do both? a systematic analysis of randomized controlled trials of biologic agents for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;66(3):369-375
- van der Wal MB, van de Kar AL, Tuinebreijer WE, et al. The modified patient and observer scar assessment scale: a novel approach to defining pathologic and nonpathologic scarring? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129(1):172-174.
- Singer AJ, Arora B, Dagum A, Valentine S, Hollander JE. Development and validation of a novel scar evaluation scale. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(7):1892-1897
- Baryza MJ, Baryza GA. The Vancouver Scar Scale: an administration tool and its interrater reliability. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1995;16(5):535-538.
- Tabachnick, Barbara G., and Linda S. Fidell. Using Multivariate Statistics. 7th ed., Pearson, 2018.
Supplementary files
