Robot-assisted esophageal surgery in children

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The current literature contains a considerable number of reports on robot-assisted pediatric surgery, particularly regarding procedures performed on the genitourinary system. However, reports of operations on the digestive organs—especially the esophagus—are much less common.

AIM: To evaluate the efficiency and safety of the robot-assisted esophageal surgery.

METHODS: Аn incomparable clinical trial was conducted using the medical records of six patients who underwent robot-assisted thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophageal surgery over a 24-month period starting in December 2022. All patients were treated in accordance with protocols approved by clinical guidelines or national recommendations for pediatric surgery. The indications for surgery included persistent anatomical and functional disorders unresponsive to conservative therapy, risk of future organ damage, and were determined following thorough examination. Robotic procedures were performed in one patient with a cystic duplication of the thoracic esophagus, two patients with achalasia of the cardiac section, and three patients with gastroesophageal reflux.

RESULTS: A total of 18 patients who underwent robot-assisted esophageal surgery were included in the study. Robotic procedures were performed in one patient with cystic duplication of the thoracic esophagus, five patients with achalasia of the cardiac section, and twelve patients with gastroesophageal reflux. The mean age at surgery was 7.6 ± 3.6 years (median = 7.0 [5.0; 10.0]), and mean body weight was 30.6 ± 20.4 kg (median = 23.0 [15.0; 50.0]). The average operative time was 132.7 ± 34.8 minutes (median = 125.0 [105.0; 155.0]). No intraoperative complications such as bleeding, organ perforation, or injury to adjacent structures were recorded, and there were no conversions to laparoscopic, thoracoscopic, or open surgery. The mean stay in the intensive care unit was 17.0 ± 7.8 hours (median = 22.0 [8.0; 24.0]), and the mean hospital stay was 4.0 ± 1.1 days (median = 4.0 [3.0; 5.0]). No significant postoperative complications or recurrence of symptoms were observed during follow-up, and all patients demonstrated normal digestive function throughout the observation period.

CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted thoracoscopic and laparoscopic surgical approaches are safe and effective methods for treating esophageal diseases in children.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Yury A. Kozlov

Irkutsk State Regional Children’s Clinical Hospital; Branch of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Further Professional Education «Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education»; Irkutsk State Medical University

Email: yuriherz@hotmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2313-897X
SPIN-code: 3682-0832

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Russian Federation, Irkutsk; Irkutsk; Irkutsk

Alexander P. Rozhanski

Irkutsk State Regional Children’s Clinical Hospital; Irkutsk State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: alexanderozhanski@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7922-7600
SPIN-code: 4012-7120
Russian Federation, Irkutsk; Irkutsk

Simon S. Poloyan

Irkutsk State Regional Children’s Clinical Hospital; Irkutsk State Medical University

Email: imonpoloyan@ya.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7042-6646
Russian Federation, Irkutsk; Irkutsk

Eduard V. Sapukhin

Irkutsk State Regional Children’s Clinical Hospital

Email: sapukhin@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5470-7384
Russian Federation, Irkutsk

Alexey S. Strashinsky

Irkutsk State Regional Children’s Clinical Hospital

Email: leksus-642@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1911-4468
SPIN-code: 9210-5286
Russian Federation, Irkutsk

Anna O. Ryakhina

Irkutsk State Regional Children’s Clinical Hospital

Email: romahka@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0006-0340-1186
Russian Federation, Irkutsk

Julia P. Semshchikova

Irkutsk State Medical University

Email: jsemshikova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9049-0450
SPIN-code: 1536-0612
Russian Federation, Irkutsk

References

  1. Denning NL, Kallis MP, Prince JM. Pediatric robotic surgery. Surg Clin North Am. 2020;100(2):431–443. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2019.12.004 EDN: GAWIAT
  2. Mei H, Tang S. Robotic-assisted surgery in the pediatric surgeons’ world: current situation and future prospectives. Front Pediatr. 2023;11:1120831. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1120831 EDN: RBCKSR
  3. Meehan JJ. Robotic surgery in small children: is there room for this? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009;19(5):707–712. doi: 10.1089/lap.2008.0178
  4. Shen LT, Tou J. Application and prospects of robotic surgery in children: a scoping review. World J Pediatr Surg. 2022;5(4):e000482. doi: 10.1136/wjps-2022-000482 EDN: LSWTQW
  5. Meehan JJ, Phearman L, Sandler A. Robotic pulmonary resections in children: series report and introduction of a new robotic instrument. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2008;18(2):293–295. doi: 10.1089/lap.2007.0078
  6. Meehan JJ, Sandler A. Robotic repair of a Bochdalek congenital diaphragmatic hernia in a small neonate: robotic advantages and limitations. J Pediatr Surg. 2007;42(10):1757–1760. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.06.013
  7. Ballouhey Q, Villemagne T, Cros J, et al. Assessment of paediatric thoracic robotic surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015;20(3):300–303. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu406
  8. Shah J, Rockall T, Darzi A. Robot-assisted laparoscopic Heller’s cardiomyotomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2002;12(1):30–32. doi: 10.1097/00129689-200202000-00005
  9. Na KJ, Park S, Park IK, et al. Outcomes after total robotic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched comparison with hybrid robotic esophagectomy. J Thorac Dis. 2019;11(12):5310–5320. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.11.58
  10. Molinaro F, Angotti R, Bindi E, et al. Low weight child: can it be considered a limit of robotic surgery? Experience of two centers. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019;29(5):698–702. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0681
  11. Meehan JJ, Sandler A. Pediatric robotic surgery: a single-institutional review of the first 100 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(1):177–182. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9418-2 EDN: JAOVRH
  12. Klein MD, Langenburg SE, Kabeer M, et al. Pediatric robotic surgery: lessons from a clinical experience. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2007;17(2):265–271. doi: 10.1089/lap.2006.0034
  13. Meehan JJ. Robotic surgery in small children: is there room for this? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009;19(5):707–712. doi: 10.1089/lap.2008.0178
  14. Ferrero PA, Blanc T, Binet A, et al. The potential and the limitations of esophageal robotic surgery in children. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2022;32(2):170–176. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1721770 EDN: UXDHYY
  15. Horgan S, Berger RA, Elli EF, Espat NJ. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive transhiatal esophagectomy. Am Surg. 2003;69(7):624–626.
  16. Bodner JC, Zitt M, Ott H, et al. Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) for benign and malignant esophageal tumors. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80(4):1202–1206. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.03.061
  17. Chaer RA, Jacobsen G, Elli F, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pediatric Heller’s cardiomyotomy: initial case report. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2004;14(5):270–273. doi: 10.1089/lap.2004.14.270
  18. Lorincz A, Langenburg S, Klein MD. Robotics and the pediatric surgeon. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2003;15(3):262–266. doi: 10.1097/00008480-200306000-00006
  19. Knight CG, Lorincz A, Gidell KM, et al. Computer-assisted robot-enhanced laparoscopic fundoplication in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2004;39(6):864–866; discussion 864-866. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.02.022
  20. Najmaldin A, Antao B. Early experience of tele-robotic surgery in children. Int J Med Robot. 2007;3(3):199–202. doi: 10.1002/rcs.150
  21. Camps JI. The use of robotics in pediatric surgery: my initial experience. Pediatr Surg Int. 2011;27(9):991–996. doi: 10.1007/s00383-011-2901-9
  22. Ballouhey Q, Dib N, Binet A, et al. How robotic-assisted surgery can decrease the risk of mucosal tear during Heller myotomy procedure? J Robot Surg. 2017;11(2):255–258. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0658-9
  23. Altokhais T, Mandora H, Al-Qahtani A, Al-Bassam A. Robot-assisted Heller’s myotomy for achalasia in children. Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon). 2016;21(1):127–131. doi: 10.1080/24699322.2016.1217352
  24. Montalva L, Viala J, Michelet D, et al. Total laparoscopic approach for transhiatal esophagectomy and gavriliu’s esophagoplasty in children with caustic esophageal injuries. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017;27(10):1085–1090. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0053

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Robot-assisted treatment of esophagus cystic doubling: myotomy stage.

Download (114KB)
3. Fig. 2. Robot-assisted treatment of esophageal achalasia: cardiomyotomy stage.

Download (89KB)
4. Fig. 3. Robot-assisted treatment of gastroesophageal reflux: pulling the stomach fundus behind the esophagus.

Download (87KB)

Copyright (c) 2025 Эко-вектор

License URL: https://eco-vector.com/for_authors.php#07