Validation of a domestic nomogram for predicting the outcome of shock-wave lithotripsy in children with urolithiasis



Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2024, the first Russian nomogram for predicting the outcome of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in children was developed in the urological department of the National Medical Research Center for Children’s Health. The nomogram represents a mathematical relationship between several factors, thus predicting the outcome of the operation, which allows a personalized and objective approach to the choice of treatment tactics for each patient. For further implementation of the developed nomogram into clinical practice it is necessary to perform its external validation.

AIMS: to externally validate and assess the accuracy of the domestic nomogram for predicting the efficacy of ESWL in children with urolithiasis.

METHODS: A prospective non-randomized comparative study was conducted on a group of children under the age of 18 with renal calculi, who received treatment in the urological department of the National Medical Research Center for Children’s Health between January 2024 and September 2024. All patients underwent lithotripsy on the same Dornier Compact Sigma device. The criterion of treatment effectiveness was the absence of stone fragments >3 mm in the urinary tract according to the ultrasound performed 3 months after surgery. Depending on the success of treatment, the patients were divided into two groups, after which the statistical analysis of the influence of various factors on the outcome of the lithotripsy session was performed. The prognostic accuracy of the previously created nomogram was also evaluated.

RESULTS: A total of 86 renal units were included in the study. The mean age of patients was 12 years (6.25 - 15.00), female gender was predominant: 49 (57%) girls versus 37 (43%) boys. The efficacy of lithotripsy was 52.3%. In the comparative analysis, there was no statistically significant effect of gender (p = 0.250) and age (p = 0.839) of the patients on the outcome of ESWL. When comparing the multiplicity and accuracy of localization as a function of the success of the ESWL session, we found statistically significant differences (p = 0.010 and p = 0.012, respectively). Size, volume, and density of the stone remained the most significant predictors of success (p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis proved the statistical significance of the sum of the nomogram scores and the possibility of its use as an independent predictor of the success of the ESWL session (p < 0.001). Analysis of the confusion matrix showed that the nomogram sensitivity was 82.22%, specificity 78.05%, error-free 89.23%, accuracy 80.43%. The F-measure of the model was 0.81.

CONCLUSIONS: External validation of the first Russian nomogram confirmed its high predictive ability and clinical significance in assessing the probability of success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children with urolithiasis.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Antonina D. Lobanova

National Medical Research Center for Children's Health

Author for correspondence.
Email: lobanova.ad@nczd.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7971-5073
SPIN-code: 2665-2856

MD

Россия, Moscow

Sergey N. Zorkin

National Medical Research Center for Children’s Health

Email: zorkin@nczd.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4038-1472
SPIN-code: 4762-8837

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

Россия, 2 bldg 1 Lomonosovsky prospekt, 119991 Moscow

Rimir R. Bayazitov

National Medical Research Center for Children’s Health

Email: krasik17@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2809-1894
SPIN-code: 5506-6828

кандидат медицинских наук

Россия, Moscow

Dmitriy S. Shakhnovskiy

National Medical Research Center for Children’s Health

Email: shahnovskii_dmit@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2883-2493
SPIN-code: 4946-0848
Россия, Moscow

References

  1. Ang AJS, Sharma AA, Sharma A. Nephrolithiasis: Approach to Diagnosis and Management. Indian J Pediatr. 2020;87(9):716-725. doi: 10.1007/s12098-020-03424-7
  2. Akin Y, Yucel S. Long-term effects of pediatric extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy on renal function. Res Rep Urol. 2014;6:21-25. Published 2014 Apr 28. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S40965
  3. Brinkmann OA, Griehl A, Kuwertz-Bröking E et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children. Effcacy, complications and long-term follow-up. Eur Urol. 2001;39(5):591–597. doi: 10.1159/000052509
  4. Ather MH, Noor MA. Does size and site matter for renal stones up to 30-mm in size in children treated by extracorporeal lithotripsy? Urology. 2003;61(1):212-215. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02128-3
  5. Kırlı EA, Türegün FA, Selçuk B, et al. Does Previous Open Stone Surgery Affect the Outcome of Shock Wave Lithotripsy Treatment in Children? Urol Int. 2021;105(1-2):52-58. doi: 10.1159/000509563
  6. McAdams S, Shukla AR. Pediatric extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: Predicting successful outcomes. Indian J Urol. 2010;26(4):544-548. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.74457
  7. McAdams S, Kim N, Ravish IR, et al. Stone size is only independent predictor of shock wave lithotripsy success in children: a community experience. J Urol. 2010;184(2):659-664. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.059
  8. Onal B, Tansu N, Demirkesen O, et al. Nomogram and scoring system for predicting stone-free status after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children with urolithiasis. BJU Int. 2013;111(2):344–352. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11281.x
  9. Dogan HS, Altan M, Citamak B, et al. A new nomogram for prediction of outcome of pediatric shock-wave lithotripsy. J Pediatr Urol. 2015;11(2):84.e1-84.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.01.004
  10. Zhao FZ, Li J, Tang L, et al. Comparison of efficacy and safety of minimally invasive procedures for 10-20 mm pediatric renal Stones-A bayesian network meta-analysis. J Pediatr Urol. 2020;16(6):771-781. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.08.019
  11. Grosso AA, Sessa F, Campi R, et al. Intraoperative and postoperative surgical complications after ureteroscopy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021;73(3):309-332. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04294-4
  12. Kanao K, Nakashima J, Nakagawa K, et al. Preoperative nomograms for predicting stone-free rate after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol. 2006;176(4 Pt 1):1453-1457. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.06.089
  13. Dogan HS, Tekgul S. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: principles of fragmentation techniques. In: Godbole P, Koyle M, Wilcox D, eds. Pediatric Endourology Techniques. London: Springer; 2014: 257- 263.
  14. Lee HY, Yang YH, Lee YL, et al. Noncontrast computed tomography factors that predict the renal stone outcome after shock wave lithotripsy. Clin Imaging. 2015;39(5):845-850. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.04.010
  15. Yuri P, Hariwibowo R, Soeroharjo I, et al. Meta-analysis of Optimal Management of Lower Pole Stone of 10 - 20 mm: Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) versus Percutaneus Nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Acta Med Indones. 2018;50(1):18-25.
  16. Atan A., Polat F., Turkyilmaz Z., Sonmez K. Areas of Alpha-1 Receptor Blocker Usage in Pediatric Urology. GMJ. 2020; 31: 457-459. doi: 10.12996/gmj.2020.112
  17. Tian D., Li N., Huang W., et al. The efficacy and safety of adrenergic alpha-antagonists in treatment of distal ureteral stones in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg. 2017; 52: 360–365. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.10.003
  18. Yanaral F, Ozgor F, Savun M, et al. Shock-wave Lithotripsy for Pediatric Patients: Which Nomogram Can Better Predict Postoperative Outcomes? Urology. 2018;117:126-130. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.03.045

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) Lobanova A.D., Zorkin S.N., Bayazitov R.R., Shakhnovskiy D.S.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies