Bile duct reconstruction in choledochal malformations in children


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Introduction. Currently, there is ongoing discussion regarding the method of biliary tract reconstruction in children with choledochal malformations (CM).

Purpose. To make a comparative analysis of the techniques applied in bile duct reconstruction in children with CM.

Material and methods. For 10 years we have admitted 99 patients with CM. 84 children with CM were operated on from January 2010 to May 2020. Group 1 - patients who had Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (RYHJ, n = 68, 81%); Group 2 - patients who had hepaticoduodenostomy (HD, n = 16, 19%). The surgical access varied depending on the biliodigestive anastomosis technique. It was mini-laparotomy and laparoscopy. Surgical time, short-term and long-term postoperative outcomes were analyzed.

Results. Groups were comparable in gender, age, clinical manifestations, CM complications before surgery, accompanied comorbidity (p > 0.05). It was found that CM types differ depending on the child’s age when the diagnosis was established ( p = 0.0493, Kruskal- Wallis test); there was also a statistically significant difference in the pair between CM 1C and CM 1F (p = 0.0164, paired post-test). It means that children with CM 1F were older, median age 49 months (Q1-Q3: 12-86 months), than children with CM 1C, median age 14 months (Q1-Q3: 5-30 months). In HD group, severe postoperative pancreatitis, which was not controlled with conservative therapy, developed more often (n = 2) (p <0.05) and required a number of repeated surgeries including re-hepatico and hepaticojejunostomoses, thus prolonging the length of stay in ICU and increasing much the number of bed days.

Conclusion. In our study, RYHJ technique has some advantages over HD one. Therefore, at present we can recommend it as a basic one.

About the authors

A. Yu. Razumovskiy

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; N.F. Filatov Municipal Children’s Hospital

Author for correspondence.
Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9497-4070

Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation

Moscow, 123001, Russian Federation

Russian Federation

Z. B. Mitupov

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; N.F. Filatov Municipal Children’s Hospital

Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0016-6444

Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation

Moscow, 123001, Russian Federation

Russian Federation

N. V. Kulikova

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; N.F. Filatov Municipal Children’s Hospital

Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0834-2630

Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation

Moscow, 123001, Russian Federation

Russian Federation

N. S. Stepanenko

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; N.F. Filatov Municipal Children’s Hospital

Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2827-1764

Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation

Moscow, 123001, Russian Federation

Russian Federation

A. S. Zadvernyuk

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; N.F. Filatov Municipal Children’s Hospital

Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4379-8051

Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation

Moscow, 123001, Russian Federation

Russian Federation

A. V. Adler

N.F. Filatov Municipal Children’s Hospital

Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6084-8263

Moscow, 123001, Russian Federation

Russian Federation

N. V. Shubin

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; N.F. Filatov Municipal Children’s Hospital

Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3838-0067

Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation

Moscow, 123001, Russian Federation

Russian Federation

References

  1. Singham J., Yoshida E.M., Scudamore C.H. Choledochal cysts: part 1 of 3: classification and pathogenesis. Can J Surg. 2009; 52: 434–40. PMCID: PMC2769090.
  2. Jan Y.Y., Chen H.M., Chen M.F. Malignancy in choledochal cysts. Hepatogastroenterology. 2000; 47: 337–40. PMID: 10791183.
  3. Tan S.S., Tan N.C., Ibrahim S., Tay K.H. Management of adult choledochal cyst. Singapore Med J. 2007; 48: 524–7. PMID: 17538750.
  4. Clifton M.S., Goldstein R.B., Slavotinek A., Norton M.E., Lee H., Farrell J., Nobuhara K.K. Prenatal diagnosis of familial type I choledochal cyst. Pediatrics. 2006; 117:e596–600. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2005-1411
  5. Yeung F., Fung A.C.H., Chung P.H.Y., Wong K.K.Y. Short-term and long-term outcomes after Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy versus hepaticoduodenostomy following laparoscopic excision of choledochal cyst in children. Surg Endosc. 2020; 34(5): 2172-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07004-5.
  6. Xie X., Li K., Wang J., Wang C., Xiang B. Comparison of pediatric choledochal cyst excisions with open procedures, laparoscopic procedures and robot-assisted procedures: a retrospective study [published online ahead of print, 2020 Apr 28]. Surg Endosc. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07560-1.
  7. Schwab M.E., Song H., Mattis A., et al. De novo somatic mutations and KRAS amplification are associated with cholangiocarcinoma in a patient with a history of choledochal cyst [published online ahead of print, 2020 Mar 24]. J Pediatr Surg., 2020; S0022-3468(20)30204-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.03.008.
  8. Соколов Ю.Ю., Ефременкова А.М., Туманян Г.Т., Акопян М.К., Уткина Т.В. Острый панкреатит как осложнение кист холедоха у детей. Детская хирургия. 2020; 24(10): 75.eLIBRARY ID: 42484928.
  9. Козлов Ю.А., Новожилов В.А., Вебер И.Н., Ковальков К.А., Чубко Д.М., Распутин А.А., Барадиева П.Ж., Тимофеев А.Д., Звонков Д.А., Ус Г.П., Кузнецова Н.Н., Распутина Н.В., Кононенко М.И. Лечение кист холедоха у детей с использованием лапароскопической, гепатикодуоденостомии. Эндоскопическая хирургия. 2018; 24(2): 43-7. https://doi.org/10.17116/endoskop201824243.
  10. Вишневский В.А. Андрейцева О.И., Ионкин Д.А., Королева А.А., Повторные операции у больных с кистозными трансформациями желчных протоков. Практическая медицина. 2016; 5: 96-104. eLIBRARY ID: 26685093.
  11. Makin E., Davenport M. Understanding choledochal malformation. Arch Dis Child. 2012; 97: 69–72. doi: 10.1136/adc.2010.195974.
  12. Ten Hove A., de Meijer V.E., Hulscher J.B.F., de Kleine R.H.J. Metaanalysis of risk of developing malignancy in congenital choledochal malformation. Br J Surg. 2018; 105(5): 482-90. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10798.
  13. Ten Hove A., de Meijer V.E., Hulscher J.B.F., de Kleine R.H.J. Metaanalysis of risk of developing malignancy in congenital choledochal malformation. 2018;105(5):482490. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10798.
  14. Todani T., Watanabe Y., Urushihara N., Noda T., Morotomi Y. Biliary complications after excisional procedure for choledochal cyst. J Pediatr Surg. 1995; 30(3): 478-81. doi: 10.1016/0022-3468(95)90060-8.
  15. Ando H., Ito T., Kaneko K., Seo T. Congenital stenosis of the intrahepatic bile duct associated with choledochal cysts. J Am Coll Surg. 1995; 181(5): 426-30.
  16. Uno K., Tsuchida Y., Kawarasaki H., Ohmiya H., Honna T. Development of intrahepatic cholelithiasis long after primary excision of choledochal cysts. J Am Coll Surg. 1996; 183(6): 583-8.
  17. Kim J.H., Choi T.Y., Han J.H., et al. Risk factors of postoperative anastomotic stricture after excision of choledochal cysts with hepaticojejunostomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008; 12(5): 822-8. doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0415-5.
  18. Ono S., Fumino S., Shimadera S., Iwai N. Long-term outcomes after hepaticojejunostomy for choledochal cyst: a 10- to 27-year follow-up. J Pediatr Surg. 2010; 45(2): 376-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.10.078.
  19. Chang X., Zhang X., Xiong M., et al. Laparoscopic-assisted cyst excision and ductoplasty plus widened portoenterostomy for choledochal cysts with a narrow portal bile duct. Surg Endosc. 2019; 33(6): 1998-2007. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06635-4.
  20. Urushihara N., Fukumoto K., Nouso H., et al. Hepatic ductoplasty and hepaticojejunostomy to treat narrow common hepatic duct during laparoscopic surgery for choledochal cyst. Pediatr Surg Int. 2015; 31(10): 983–6. doi: 10.1007/s00383-015-3779-8.
  21. Jung K, Han HS, Cho JY, Yoon YS, Hwang DW. Is preoperative subclassification of type I choledochal cyst necessary? Korean J Radiol. 2012;13(Suppl 1):S112–6. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2012.13.S1.S112.
  22. Stringer M.D. Laparoscopic management of choledochal cysts: is a keyhole view missing the big picture? PediatrSurgInt. 2017; 33: 6515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-017-4089-0.
  23. Moslim M.A., Takahashi H., Seifarth F.G., Walsh R.M., Morris-Stiff G. Choledochal Cyst Disease in a Western Center: A 30-Year Experience. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016; 20(8): 1453-63. doi: 10.1007/s11605-016-3181-4.
  24. Sastry A.V., Abbadessa B., Wayne M.G., Steele J.G., Cooperman A.M. What is the incidence of biliary carcinoma in choledochal cysts, when do they develop, and how should it affect management? World J Surg. 2015; 39(2): 487–92. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2831-5.
  25. Hwang H.S., Kim M.J., Lee S.S., et al. Smooth Muscle Distribution Patterns of Choledochal Cysts and Their Implications for Pathogenesis and Postoperative Complications. Am J Clin Pathol. 2020; 153(6): 760-71. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqaa002.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c)

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies