Comparison of laser ablation and Karidakis surgery for treating epithelial coccygeal passages

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laser ablation is a technique which was originally used to treat various cystic and fistulous structures. Due to promising results, surgeons began to use diode lasers to treat pilonidal cysts. The authors developed their own technique of ultrasonic-guided laser ablation in patients with the discussed pathology.

AIM: To compare outcomes after laser ablation and Karidakis surgery for treating pilonidal cysts.

METHODS: A prospective non-randomized comparative study was performed. Outcomes of surgical interventions were analyzed in 71 patient with pilonidal disease: 24 patients were operated with laser obliteration technique and 47 — with Karidakis technique. The researchers compared: time of wound healing and number of recurrences, complications, length of hospital stay and duration of postoperative pain.

RESULTS: Mean operative time in the laser group was 26.45±5.41 min (20–35 min), while in the Karidakis group — 58.63±7.42 min (50–75 min). In the laser group, primary healing was registered in 23 out of 24 patients (95.8%) with an overall complication rate 20.83%. In each group, there were registered two cases with relapses after discharge. The obtained clinical results, in general, were comparable to those in the world literature. However, the quality of life of patients after laser treatment was significantly better than after traditional surgical intervention which is confirmed by less hospital stay up to 5–7 bed-days; by less surgical time, in average, 25 minutes; faster recovery — within one week after surgery; faster return to everyday life, as well as less pain syndrome in the postoperative period.

CONCLUSION: Laser ablation of the coccygeal tract is comparable to Karidakis surgery in terms of wound healing and recurrences, but it gives better results in terms of surgical time, hospital stay and postoperative pain.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Dmitriy S. Zolotukhin

South-Ural State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: as12er@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2942-1450

MD

Russian Federation, Chelyabinsk

Igor' V. Krochek

South-Ural State Medical University

Email: igor_krochek@mail.ru
SPIN-code: 1576-0634

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine); Professor

Russian Federation, Chelyabinsk

Sergey V. Sergiyko

South-Ural State Medical University

Email: doctord74@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6694-9030
SPIN-code: 5558-1362

MD; Dr. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Chelyabinsk

References

  1. Iesalnieks I, Ommer A. The management of pilonidal sinus. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2019;116(1-2):12-21. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2019.0012
  2. Steele SR, Perry WB, Mills S, Buie WD. Practice parameters for the managemen tof pilonidal disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56(9):1021-1027. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31829d2616
  3. Stauffer VK, Luedi MM, Kauf P, et al. Common surgical procedures in pilonidal sinus disease: A meta-analysis, merged data analysis, and comprehensive studyon recurrence. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):3058. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20143-4
  4. Dessily M, Charara F, Ralea S, Alle JL. Pilonidal sinus destruction with a radiallaser probe: Technique and first Belgian experience. Acta Chir Belg. 2017;117(3):164-168. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2016.1272285
  5. Porwal A, Gandhi P, Kulkarni D. Laser pilonidotomyda new approach inmanagement of complex pilonidal sinus disease: An exploratory study. J Coloproctology. 2020;40(1):24-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jcol.2019.10.007
  6. Krochek IV, Shumillin II. Our experience in outpatient surgical treatment of epithelial coccygeal passage with a fiber optic laser. Laser Med. 2019;23(3):21. EDN: UBIURS
  7. Khubezov DA, Lukanin RV, Krotkov AR, et al. Laser ablation for pilonidal disease. Coloproctology. 2020;19(2):91-103. EDN: IJLEXN doi: 10.33878/2073-7556-2020-19-2-91-103
  8. Zolotukhin DS, Krochek IV, Sergiyko SV. Treatment of the pilonidal sinus in children using laser radiation. Laser Med. 2020;24(4):32-36. EDN: RBAINO doi: 10.37895/2071-8004-2020-24-4-32-36
  9. Chernyadyev SA, Chernookov AI, Zhilyakov AV, Korobova NY. Comparison of the effectiveness between the method of interstitial laser obliteration coagulation and surgery baker cyst under control arthroscope. Surgeon. 2014;(10):73-77. EDN: SYUFZR
  10. Wilhelm A. A new technique for sphincter-preserving anal fistula repair using anovel radial emitting laser probe. Tech Coloproctol. 2011;15(4):445-449. EDN: JVRYHA doi: 10.1007/s10151-011-0726-0
  11. Georgiou GK. Outpatient laser treatment of primary pilonidal disease: The pilat technique. Tech Coloproctol. 2018;22(10):773-778. doi: 10.1007/s10151-018-1863-5
  12. Pappas A, Christodoulou D. A new minimally invasive treatment of pilonidalsinus disease with the use of a diode laser: A prospective large series of patients. Colorectal Dis. 2018;20(8):207-214.doi: 10.1111/codi.14285
  13. Dessily M, Dziubeck M, Chahidi E, et al. The SiLaC procedure for pilonidal sinusdisease: Long-term outcomes of a single institution prospective study. Tech Coloproctol. 2019; 23:1133-1140. EDN: UIZXGK doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02119-2
  14. Meinero P, Stazi A, Carbone A, et al. Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment: A prospective multicentre trial. Colorectal Dis. 2016;18(5):164-170. doi: 10.1111/codi.13322

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Epithelial coccygeal passage debridement: a — outer view; b — Volkmann spoon for cleansing the epithelial coccygeal passage (own observation).

Download (205KB)

Copyright (c) 2024 Eco-Vector

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies