Clinical, laboratory and ultrasonographic criteria for reveaing inflammation of the appendix and its regression in children

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Introduction. Because of the numerous studies on a possible regression of inflammation in the cecum appendix, the question of finding reliable criteria for preoperative verification of inflammation and of assessing its dynamics in children is relevant.
Material and methods. In January 2017 – December 2021, case-histories of 92 children aged from 3 to 18 years – (Me (age median) = 12; Q1 (lower quartile) = 9; Q2 (upper quartile) = 14.5 – were analyzed in the Yaroslavl Children's Clinical Hospital. The researchers assessed diagnostic and management algorithms. All children had a high risk of appendicitis (PAS (Pediatrics appendicitis score) ≥ 6 points) because of changes in the appendix and findings of ultrasound examination, but due to the symptoms relief, no surgical interventions were performed.
Results. 78 (84.8%) children were prescribed antibacterial therapy. The median duration of symptom regression was 2 days (Q1 = 1 day; Q2 =4 days). On days 5–8 (Q1–Q2) (Me = 6 days), relief of all symptoms of the disease was recorded.
The average diameter dimensions of the vermiform process, by ultrasound findings at the initial examination, were 8.6 ± 1.47 (95% CI 8.31–8.92), wall thickness – 3.2 ± 0.39 (95% CI 3.12–3.28). After the symptom relief , these indicators were 6.3 ± 1.29 (95% CI 5.95–6.58) and 2.0 ± 0.63 (95% CI 1.18–1.88), respectively. The decrease in size was statistically significant (p < 0.001), signs regressed in parallel (r = 0.63; p < 0.0001).
95% CI lower limit of ultrasonographic parameters at the initial examination exceeded the threshold values indicating inflammatory changes (8 mm and 2.7 mm, respectively). After regression of the disease symptoms, 95% CI upper limit returned to the normal state.
Conclusion. The presented clinical observations may be considered as cases of appendix inflammation with regression. The selected clinical and ultrasonographic criteria can be used both for verifying inflammation and for assessing the regression of inflammatory process.

About the authors

V. F. Blandinskij

Yaroslavl State Medical University

Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9392-0994

 150000, Yaroslavl 

Россия

S. V. Sokolov

Yaroslavl Children’s Clinical Hospital

Author for correspondence.
Email: sokolov_sergey@inbox.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3176-8229

 

 150042, Yaroslavl 

Россия

A. L. Anfinogenov

Yaroslavl Children’s Clinical Hospital

Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6452-4565

 150042, Yaroslavl 

Россия

A. Yu. Kislova

Yaroslavl Children’s Clinical Hospital;
Yaroslavl State Medical University

Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4714-8702

 150042, Yaroslavl 

 150000, Yaroslavl 

Россия

A. A. Nizovceva

City Emergency Hospital

Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1246-7084

347380, Volgodonsk, Rostov region 

Россия

A. I. Andreev

Yaroslavl Children’s Clinical Hospital

Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7410-1512

 150042, Yaroslavl 

Россия

I. A. Bereznjak

Yaroslavl Children’s Clinical Hospital

Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6645-1125

 150042, Yaroslavl 

Россия

D. A. Neznakomova

Yaroslavl State Medical University

Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3971-3644

 150000, Yaroslavl 

Россия

A. V. Lugovkin

Yaroslavl Children’s Clinical Hospital

Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7822-2493

 150042, Yaroslavl 

Россия

A. A. Vinogradova

Yaroslavl Children’s Clinical Hospital

Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2887-3631

 150042, Yaroslavl 

Россия

References

  1. Wilms I.M., de Hoog D.E., de Visser D.C., Janzing H.M. Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis. Cochrane database syst rev. 2011; (11): CD008359. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008359.pub2
  2. Harnoss J.C., Zelienka I., Probst P., Grummich K., Müller-Lantzsch C., Harnoss J.M., Ulrich A., Büchler M.W., Diener M.K. Antibiotics versus surgical therapy for uncomplicated appendicitis: Systematic review and Meta-analysis of controlled trials. Ann. Surg. 2017; 265(5): 889–900. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002039
  3. Salminen P., Tuominen R., Paajanen H., Rautio T., Nordström P., Aarnio M., Rantanen T., Hurme S., Mecklin J.P., Sand J., Virtanen J., Jartti A., Grönroos J.M. Five-year follow-up of antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis in the APPAC randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018; 320(12): 1259–65. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.13201
  4. Svensson J.F., Almstrom M., Naji H., Hall N.J., Eaton S., Pierro A., Wester T. Nonoperative treatment with antibiotics versus surgery for acute nonperforated appendicitis in children: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2015; 261: 67–71. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000000835
  5. Шалыгин В.А., Полковникова С.А., Варламов К.Г., Горленко Л.В. Миотропный спазмолитик в консервативном лечении недеструктивных форм острого аппендицита у детей. Медицина: теория и практика. 2019; 3(1): 108–9.
  6. Minneci P.C., Mahida J.B., Lodwick D.L., Sulkowski J.P., Nacion K.M., Cooper J.N., Ambeba E.J., Moss R.L., Deans K.J. Effectiveness of patient choice in nonoperative vs surgical management of pediatric uncomplicated acute appendicitis. JAMA Surg. 2016; 151(5): 408–15. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2015.4534
  7. Patkova B., Svenningsson A., Almstrӧm M., Eaton S., Wester T., Svensson J.F. Nonoperative treatment versus appendectomy for acute nonperforated appendicitis in children: Five-year follow up of a randomized controlled pilot trial. Ann Surg. 2020; 271: 1030–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000003646
  8. Golash V., Willson P.D. Early laparoscopy as a routine procedure in the management of acute abdominal pain: A review of 1,320 patients. Surg. Endosc. 2005; 19: 882–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8866-1
  9. Sayed A.O. Zeidan N.S. Fahmy D.M., Ibrahim H.A. Diagnostic reliability of pediatric appendicitis score, ultrasound and low-dose computed tomography scan in children with suspected acute appendicitis. Therapeutics and clinical risk management. 2017; 13: 847–54. https://doi.org/10.2147/tcrm.s134153
  10. Samuel M. Pediatric appendicitis score. J Pediatr Surg. 2002; 37: 877–81. https://doi.org/10.1053/jpsu.2002.32893
  11. Akhtar W.M., Naveed M.Z., Khandwala K. Utility and accuracy of primary and secondary ultrasonographic signs for diagnosing acute appendicitis in pediatric patients. Cureus. 2018; 10(12): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.3779
  12. Fullerton K., Depinet H., Iyer S., Hall M., Herr S., Morton I., Lee T., Melzer-Lange M., on behalf of Children’s hospital association pediatric emergency services focus group. Association of hospital resources and imaging choice for appendicitis in pediatric emergency departments. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2017; 24: 400–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13156
  13. Escribá A., Gamell A.M., Fernández Y., Quintillá J.M., Cubells C.L. Prospective validation of two systems of classification for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011; 27: 165–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/pec.0b013e31820d6460
  14. Wu Han-Ping, Yang Wen-Chieh, Wu Kang-Hsi, Chen Chan-Yu, Fu Yun-Ching. Diagnosing appendicitis at different time points in children with right lower quadrant pain: comparison between Pediatric Appendicitis Score and the Alvarado score. World J Surg. 2012; 36(1): 216–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1310-5
  15. Fu J., Zhou X., Chen L., Lu S. Abdominal ultrasound and its diagnostic accuracy in diagnosing acute appendicitis: A Meta-analysis. Front. Surg. 2021; 8: 707160. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.707160
  16. Goldin A.B., Khanna P., Thapa M., McBroom J.A., Garrison M.M., Parisi M.T. Revised ultrasound criteria for appendicitis in children improve diagnostic accuracy. Pediatr. Radiol. 2011; 41(8): 993–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-011-2018-2
  17. Trout A.T., Towbin A.J., Fierke S.R., Zhang B., Larson D.B. Appendiceal diameter as a predictor of appendicitis in children: improved diagnosis with three diagnostic categories derived from a logistic predictive model. Eur. Radiol. 2015; 25(8): 2231–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3639-x
  18. Park N.H., Oh H.E., Park H.J., Park J.Y. Ultrasonography of normal and abnormal appendix in children. World J. Radiol. 2011; 3(4): 85–91. https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v3.i4.85/
  19. Дмитриева Е.В., Буланов М.Н., Нестеренко Т.С., Пермннов E.H., Шахнина И.А. Возможности ультразвукового исследования в диагностике острого флегмонозного аппендицита у детей. Вестник Ивановской медицинской академии. 2012; 2(17): 34–41.
  20. Botter L.A., Oliveira G.R., Farias J.L., Mauramo A., Garcia R.G., Queiros M.R.G., Silva M.R.C., Neto M.J.F., Funari M.B.G. Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Einstein. 2005; 3(3): 185–9.
  21. Chicaiza H.P., Malia L., Mulvey C.H., Smith S.R. Revisiting the appendiceal diameter via ultrasound for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Pediatr. Emerg. Care. 2018; 34(11): 757–60. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000001278
  22. Hahn H., Macdonald E., Steinborn M. Sonographic detection of normal appendix in children and adolescents. Ultraschall. Med. 2008; 29(3): 281–5. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1027322
  23. Wiersma F., Srámek A., Holscher H.C. US features of the normal appendix and surrounding area in children. Radiology. 2005; 235(3): 1018–22. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2353040086
  24. Савастюк А.Е., Давыдова Л.А. Морфологические особенности червеобразного отростка у детей. Молодой учёный. 2021; 44(386): 40–6. https://moluch.ru/archive/386/85073/
  25. Ozel A., Orhan U.P., Akdana B., Disli C., Erturk S.M., Basak M., Karpat Z. Sonographic appearance of the normal appendix in children. J. Clin. Ultrasound. 2011; 39(4): 183–6.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2023 Russian Journal of Pediatric Surgery

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies